New Federal Rule Gives Home Buyers Better Access to Appraisals

WASHINGTON — A new federal rule could give millions of home buyers insights they’ve never had before about a crucial element of their mortgage application: the appraisal, including the electronic cross-checks and reviews now used by lenders to determine the amount of the loan they’ll approve.

 

The new rule will also give buyers the time and ammunition they need to challenge appraisals that they suspect contain errors. Starting this weekend, lenders nationwide will be required to inform mortgage applicants that they can receive a free copy of whatever appraisals, reviews, computer valuations and other data are used in the transaction. They will be entitled to see this material promptly after the appraisal report is completed, or three days before their loan closes, whichever is earlier. The lender will have to inform them of their new rights within three business days after receipt of their mortgage application.

This contrasts with the current system, in which lenders don’t have to provide you with a copy of the appraisal unless you request it. The additional valuation data — which may include follow-up review appraisals by a second appraiser, multiple “automated” valuations and “broker price opinions” provided at low cost by realty agents — currently are not subject to disclosure, even though they may have played a role in the final decision on your loan.

Now everything will be mandatory. You have to be given any significant information that was integral to the valuation of the property, even if you had no idea it existed and didn’t ask to see it.

The new rule implements changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act made by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. It will be overseen by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Unlike earlier rules, the disclosure requirements will be limited to mortgages that are first liens on a home, including reverse mortgages and construction loans. If you’re applying for a second mortgage or second-lien home equity credit line, the bank will not have to provide you appraisal materials, although you are still free to ask.

So what might this mean to you in practical terms? Potentially plenty. Say your appraiser works for a management firm that uses low-cost, inexperienced appraisers. By chance it turns out that your appraiser lives 80 miles away and is not familiar with local real estate trends. Then the valuation comes in low because the appraiser used inappropriate “comparable” properties, including a house that sold at a depressed price because the owners were in financial distress.

Disclaimer: for information and entertainment purposes only

Tips for Keeping a Lid on Water Usage

barrel

Alyse Ford, Mira Mesa

Every bit counts, and Alyse Ford reminds herself of that every time she bathes or cleans the kitchen. While some conservation-minded water users invest in drought-resistant landscaping, graywater systems and efficient irrigation, others like Ford take a low-tech approach.

Will water consumption effect home value in the near future?  Contact the appraisers at www.scappraisals.com for your home value questions.

“I lived in Sonoma County during the big drought of the ’70s,” when water conservation became a mantra, Ford wrote. “They also said, ‘Shower with a friend.’ … Remember, this was the ’70s!”

She became convinced that simple changes in habit could make a big difference.

“I took all that to heart and started these practices, and I’ve been doing it ever since,” said Ford, 62. “I’m kind of fanatical about it.”

She takes short, military-style showers and keeps a bucket on hand to capture flows as the water warms up, then hauls that out to her plants. Forgoing a dishwasher, she cleans dishes in buckets in the sink and saves that water for the landscaping as well.

“I try not to have any water run down the drain,” she said.

Ford hopes to install a graywater line soon. In the meantime, she irrigates with rainwater captured in a 50-gallon barrel and several large trash bins.

“I think a lot of it just comes down to awareness and not wanting to waste (water),” Ford said.

Read more at: http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/Feb/05/tp-keeping-a-tight-lid-on-water-usage/?#article-copy

Disclaimer: for information and entertainment purposes only

Thinking of Leasing a Solar PV System for your Home?

Data from the California Solar Initiative (CSI) program, the largest and longest-running residential and commercial solar incentive program in the United States, show that third-party-owned residential installations grew rapidly as the solar industry created and refined the third-party ownership model. In 2012 and 2013, more than two-thirds of residential installations in the CSI program were third-party owned. Industry reports have indicated that the growth in popularity of third-party-owned residential solar PV systems is occurring in other states as well.

Will a leased PV solar system add value to your home?  Contact the appraisers at www.scappraisals.com for your value questions.  They are the forerunners in green property appraisals.

How the Third-Party Ownership Model Works

 

Homeowners can contract with a company—sometimes called a solar leasing company, solar finance company, or third-party ownership company—to have a solar PV system installed on their rooftop (or elsewhere on their property). Depending on the agreement, the solar leasing company will often be responsible for financing, permitting, designing, installing, and maintaining the PV system. The contract between the homeowner and solar leasing company is typically structured in one of two ways:

 

  1. PPA option: the homeowner buys all of the electricity produced by the solar PV system at an agreed-upon price (or set of prices) through what is known as a power purchase agreement (PPA). The PPA prices are usually lower than or competitive with the homeowner’s local electric utility rate. PPAs are usually longer-term contracts with terms of up to 20 years.
  2. Lease option: the homeowner makes pre-established monthly payments to the solar leasing company. The payment amount is not tied to the PV system’s actual output, but it is calculated to be competitive with the homeowner’s existing electric bill.

 

Both of these contract options will usually offer a buyout option at the end of the contract term or during certain points over the contract period that would allow the homeowner to purchase and own the PV system.

Benefits:  The homeowner:

 

  • Can install a PV system without paying large upfront costs or expending time and effort to knowledgeably purchase and arrange installation of the system.
  • Will not have to operate or maintain the PV system if these responsibilities are included in the service agreement.
  • Can lock in long-term costs for electricity, which could be a major benefit if the homeowner expects electricity prices to rise in the future.

Challenges and Limitations

 

  • The homeowner may pay for the convenience of having someone else build and maintain the system by having to share some of the available incentives with the solar leasing company, although this may be offset by the convenience of the arrangement and the potential reduced cost structure offered by the solar leasing company.
  • The third-party ownership option is not consistently available throughout the country. According to the Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency (DSIRE), third-party solar PV PPAs are currently allowed or in use in all or portions of at least 22 states and the District of Columbia.

read more at: http://www.homeenergy.org/show/blog/id/519/nav/blog

Disclaimer: for information and entertainment purposes only